Should Possessors of Child Pornography Pay Restitution to the Child?

| No Comments
FindLaw columnist and Cornell law professor Sherry Colb takes on a question involving my client that has sharply divided courts: Should a person who is found to have committed the crime of possessing child pornography be required to pay restitution to each child who appears in those images? The question has been posed very sharply recently, because images of one child victim -- whose pseudonym is "Amy" -- have been at issue in 350 criminal cases across the country. Moreover, the difference in the amount of restitution awarded in those cases is dramatic: Two Florida judges together awarded over three million dollars; a California judge awarded only $5000; and a Texas judge refused any award at all.

Read Professor Colb's entire article here.
Bookmark and Share

Leave a comment

Subscribe to Blog

Enter your email address here

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by James R. Marsh published on February 26, 2010 11:26 PM.

School District PREYing on Students was the previous entry in this blog.

Lower Merion Parents Say No to Lawsuit is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

RSS Syndication


View James R. Marsh's profile on LinkedIn


Share this Content

Creative Commons License
This blog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.