January 2012 Archives

If you're awake and you've been following this blog for any length of time, your probably know that during the past two years, victims of child pornography (represented by the Marsh Law Firm and pioneering attorneys Paul G. Cassell and Carol L. Hepburn ) have been seeking restitution in federal courts throughout the country.

Using a long forgotten passage in the Violence Against Women Act championed by then-Senator Joe Biden in 1994, child sex abuse victims are asking federal judges to award the mandatory restitution guaranteed by this law.

Unfortunately, the Justice Department has abandoned victims of child pornography on appeal by advancing a legal standard which the courts consider unworkable. The Justice Department's position is effectively preventing hundreds of child victims from receiving any money from the tens of thousands of child molesters and pedophiles who collect and trade child sex abuse images.

In October, the Justice Department filed a Supreme Court brief opposing child exploitation victims. Last month, the Justice Department asked the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals to nullify a court-ordered million dollar award to a child sex abuse victim, arguing that the legal standard which resulted in the award is too easy.

Why is the Justice Department arguing for something which the courts of appeal say is unworkable and un-provable, while victims of child exploitation are left with nothing?

Now, just last week, the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals—at the Justice Department's urging—decided to reconsider a landmark decision in favor of victims of child pornography. The Justice Department has one more chance to do the right thing and support victims of child exploitation.

Please tell President Obama's political appointee to the Department of Justice Criminal Division, Lanny A. Breuer, to side with the victim in In re: Amy Unknown in the Fifth Circuit.

When Justice Department attorneys refused to even sit with Amy at last year's oral argument before the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans, Chief Judge Edith Jones proclaimed:

"What I don't understand is why the government has switched sides. They were on Amy's side in the trial court, were they not? I'm not sure how they can switch sides now and say that the statute doesn't entitle her to relief. That seems very—if not duplicitous—very strange to me. And it's also in derogation of the obvious intent of that provision of the statute."

Amy and child victims like her need your help. Hundreds of victims are effectively shut-out of the federal courts by the Justice Department's wrongheaded policy.

Almost 20 years ago, then-Senator Joe Biden promised child victims that they would receive full restitution from criminals convicted of child exploitation. Ironically, Vice President Biden's own Justice Department is failing to live up to his vision in the Violence Against Women's Act.

You can help awaken the Justice Department lawyers in Washington with just a few clicks. Amy thanks everyone for their continued support. You can make a difference in her fight for justice!

For more information on this issue, visit http://www.childlaw.us/restitution/

Bookmark and Share

In the January edition of Pediatrics researchers explored two issues: The Prevalence and Characteristics of Youth Sexting and How Often Are Teens Arrested for Sexting?

Sexting

Prior to the research estimates of the prevalence of sexting varied considerably depending on the nature of the images or videos and the role of the youth involved.

A cross-sectional national telephone survey of 1560 youth Internet users, ages 10 through 17, discovered that only 2.5% of youth appeared in or created nude or nearly nude pictures or videos.

However, this percentage was reduced to 1.0% when the definition was restricted to only include images that were sexually explicit (ie, showed naked breasts, genitals, or bottoms). Of the youth who participated in the survey, 7.1% said they had received nude or nearly nude images of others; 5.9% of youth reported receiving sexually explicit images. Few youth distributed these images.

The researchers concluded that since policy debates on youth sexting behavior focus on concerns about the production and possession of illegal child pornography, it is important to have research that collects details about the nature of the sexual images rather than using ambiguous screening questions without follow-ups.

The rate of youth exposure to sexting highlights a need to provide them with information about legal consequences of sexting and advice about what to do if they receive a sexting image. However, the data suggest that appearing in, creating, or receiving sexual images is far from being a normative behavior for youth.

The second study examined the characteristics of youth sexting cases handled by police and their outcomes in response to clinical and other concerns about the risks of sexting behavior.

Mail surveys were sent to a stratified national sample of 2712 law enforcement agencies followed by detailed telephone interviews with investigators about a nationally representative sample of sexting cases handled by police during 2008 and 2009 (n = 675). The cases involved “youth-produced sexual images” that constituted child pornography under relevant statutes according to respondents.

The researchers discovered that US law enforcement agencies handled an estimated 3477 cases of youth-produced sexual images during 2008 and 2009 (95% confidence interval: 3282-3672). Two-thirds of the cases involved an “aggravating” circumstance beyond the creation and/or dissemination of a sexual image.

In these aggravated cases, either an adult was involved (36% of cases) or a minor engaged in malicious, non-consensual, or abusive behavior (31% of cases). An arrest occurred in 62% of cases with an adult involved, in 36% of the aggravated youth-only cases, and in 18% of the “experimental” cases (youth-only and no aggravating elements).

Most of the images (63%) were distributed by cell phone only and did not reach the Internet. Sex offender registration applied in only a few unusual cases.

The conclusion of this study is that many of the youth sexting cases that come to the attention of police include aggravating circumstances that raise concerns about health and risky sexual behavior, although some cases were relatively benign. Overall, arrest is not typical in cases with no adults involved.

Prevalence and Characteristics of Youth Sexting: A National Study

How Often Are Teens Arrested for Sexting? Data From a National Sample of Police Cases

Bookmark and Share

New Year's Resolutions 2012

| No Comments

Like everyone else on the planet, I've been publishing more and more content on the much-maligned Facebook. If you really want to absorb each and everything I publish, flag, highlight, champion, condemn, etc., then please join the Marsh Law Firm Facebook page. There's lots of good stuff there which I routinely post throughout the day when a full-blown blog entry, commentary and analysis isn't warranted or, more likely, when I don't have enough time to delve into the issue.

If you don't have Facebook or completely despise and eschew the site (perhaps based on my oft-repeated warnings and criticisms), then you can follow my Facebook postings by subscribing to my Twitter feed. Everything which I post on Facebook gets reduced to a tweet where you can just click on the link and view the content NFBR. (no Facebook required).

If you hate Facebook and don't know a Tweet from a Quack (no comments please), then you can join my LinkedIn page and receive a great deal of the content which I Tweet and Facebook. LinkedIn also has feeds which you can follow and both my Blog and Facebook page are accessible from my LinkedIn profile.

If you are so incredibly old-school that neither Facebook, Twitter or LinkedIn has captured your time and attention (and you can identify and use a 2400 baud dial-up modem), then you can follow this blog's post via RSS. You can also follow the blog's comments via RSS.

Finally, if none of the above appeal to you, then you can always subscribe or stay subscribed to this blog via email. Whether via AOL or Gmail, good old email is probably here to stay at least for another year.

The best way to tie all this together is via TweetDeck (which will aggregate all your Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn feeds in one customizable page, but not RSS) and this great little program called Desktop Google Reader which will aggregate all your RSS feeds. TweetDeck is also available on the iPhone. An app called Reeder does a great job handling RSS feeds on the iPhone.

So, although you may want to run from our numerous mutli-faceted never-ceasing blogs, Tweets and FBs, you can never really hide. Maybe by next year we'll be GooglePlus-ing. Then we'll really have you.

Wishing everyone health, peace and contentment in the coming year. Now Tweet that for a change!

ChildLaw Blog Linking Resource Guide

Marsh Law Firm Facebook Page

ChildLaw Twitter Feed

James Marsh LinkedIn Profile

ChildLaw Blog Posts RSS Feed

ChildLaw Blog Comments RSS Feed

ChildLaw Blog Email Subscribe Form

TweetDeck

Desktop Google Reader

iPhone Reeder

Marsh Law Firm on Google+

Bookmark and Share

Search the Blog

Loading

Subscribe to Blog

Enter your email address

Subscribe to Comments

Follow Us on Facebook

Follow Us on Twitter

Loading...

Recent Comments

  • Todd: This is nothing. Massive corporations like DYNCORP currently traffic child read more

  • Jo Swanson: There's another fallen 'Angel' who is now serving time in read more

  • Jane E.: It's well known in the adoption reform community that the read more

  • megreiner: Thanks for posting this! As someone who has written extensively read more

  • James R. Marsh: Yesterday, the Supreme Court denied cert in these two cases read more

  • Stanley Lee: Well this would be a different story, correct that the read more

  • Jane Brendan: some children r poor that why they can study :( read more

  • Lori Handrahan: http://lorihandrahan.com/2011/12/08/why-is-maine-silent-on-the-ongoing-sex-abuse-of-my-little-girl-mila/ Have you seen this video? http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=iZI1E0zaz88 Have you read read more

  • brian long: i have been trying to expose some very corrupt people read more

  • Megan Breaux: I found (from an INCREDIBLY unlikely source) a well composed read more

RSS Syndication


View James R. Marsh's profile on LinkedIn

Share Our Content

Creative Commons License
This blog is licensed under a Creative Commons License