Sexting Goes to Court – Miller v. Skumanick
This just in from the Legal Intelligencier:
A federal appeals court on Friday takes up the growing practice of “sexting” — in which teenagers transmit nude and semi-nude photos of themselves and others by phone — as the judges tackle the vexing question of whether such images can be deemed child pornography.
The appeal in Miller v. Skumanick stems from a civil rights suit brought by three Wyoming County girls against then-District Attorney George Skumanick Jr. alleging that he violated their First Amendment rights with his threat of a child pornography prosecution if they refused to take a class he had designed to educate youths about the dangers of sexting.
The case is the first in the country to challenge the constitutionality of bringing child pornography charges in the context of sexting.
I covered this case extensively last spring at Sexting Students Strike Back where you can find the legal complaint, several comments, and links to coverage in the New York Times and Pittsburgh Post-Gazette.